Last week, WeWork, the office-sharing company once valued at close to US$50 billion, filed for bankruptcy. There are many reasons behind its financial fall from grace, but one of the most mortally wounding has been the Covid disruption leading many companies to end their leases abruptly.
WeWork’s downfall comes amid broader struggles across the commercial real estate space, specifically office properties. As more workers embrace flexible work-from-home setups, office vacancies have increased, and some have warned the cratering demand for office space will worsen the risks of an “urban doom loop” dynamic at some of America’s largest cities.
That begs a question: should REIT investors be worried about the same story unfolding in Canada? Not really, according to Dean Orrico, president and CEO at Middlefield.
“I wouldn’t call it a ‘doom loop’ in Canada, but you are seeing challenges in the office market here,” Orrico told Wealth Professional in a recent interview. “There’s a real bifurcation going on in the market up here.”
A tale of two office rental segments
From his vantage point, Orrico is seeing 95% occupancy at Class A offices, whose natural lighting and generally desirable amenities have made them resilient even as many companies adopt full or partial work-from-home policies. In contrast, Class B and C offices, with older facilities and not as many great amenities surrounding them, are seeing low occupancy levels between 20% and 40%.
“You’ve had some major landlords in the US sitting on older office buildings in more challenging markets, where the value of the building is now less than the value of the mortgage on it,” he says. “You’ve seen that in places like LA and San Francisco, but you haven’t seen that in Canada.”
One thing differentiating the Canadian office property space from the US, Orrico says, is the tendency towards full-recourse lending. When the owner of a building defaults on their debt in Canada, the lender has the option not just to go after the building, but the borrower’s other assets as well. That’s in contrast to the US, where borrowers in default can just transfer ownership of the property to the lender, who might not want to own the building.
“We basically have the Big Six banks in Canada … They’re working more with owners of older buildings who might be having trouble servicing the mortgage on those properties,” he says. “You also generally have borrowers with more equity in the buildings versus their counterparts in the US, so there’s a greater cushion for the lender against any potential decrease in value in the building.”
Office-to-residential makeovers: an investable solution?
With some commercial office properties getting hollowed out, some policymakers are seeing an opportunity to help solve Canada’s housing supply shortage by repurposing increasingly vacant office buildings into multi-residential spaces.
While some jurisdictions already allow developers to construct of multi-family properties on land that was previously used for office space – Calgary is providing subsidies to incentivize that, Orrico says – that’s not the case everywhere. “In Toronto, if you want to take down an office building, the regulations require you to put up another one,” he says.
Because office-to-residential conversions tend to be very expensive – partly because of today’s elevated interest rates – Orrico says governments should work closely with the industry to develop incentives that would drive that activity. Beyond that, he says office buildings need to tick some crucial boxes before they can be a candidate for conversion.
“Any residential unit has to have natural light. If you’re converting a building from office to residential, so it’s easier to convert buildings with smaller footprints,” he says. “You want it to be relatively empty, otherwise you’ll have to negotiate with the existing tenants to vacate or convert it. … Often the most feasible strategy would be to tear down an old office building that’s empty, and replace it with a new condo or apartment building with more density because of the costs and challenges of conversion.”
With housing affordability and supply challenges likely to persist for the foreseeable future, Orrico has a constructive view on apartment REITs whose existing portfolio of conservatively managed buildings and well-covered dividends should support them into the future. On the flip side, given all the obstacles confronting office-to-residential conversions, he doesn’t expect they will become a major opportunity for public REITs.
“I don’t think there’s going to be any real opportunity for individual investors to participate,” he says. “There will be some players or companies that can have this as part of their overall strategy … but I don’t see that as being the primary engine of growth for any business.”
Disclaimer
Commissions, trailing commissions, management fees and expenses all may be associated with mutual fund investments. Please read the prospectus before investing. You will usually pay brokerage fees to your dealer if you purchase or sell units/shares of investment funds on the Toronto Stock Exchange or other alternative Canadian trading system (an “Exchange”). If the units/shares are purchased or sold on an Exchange, investors may pay more than the current net asset value when buying and may receive less than the current net asset value when selling them. There are ongoing fees and expenses associated with owning units or shares of an investment fund. An investment fund must prepare disclosure documents that contain key information about the fund. You can find more detailed information about the fund in these documents. Mutual funds and investment funds are not guaranteed, their values change frequently and past performance may not be repeated. Certain statements in this disclosure are forward-looking. Forward-looking statements (“FLS”) are statements that are predictive in nature, depend upon or refer to future events or conditions, or that include words such as “may”, “will”, “should”, “could”, “expect”, “anticipate”, “intend”, “plan”, “believe”, or “estimate”, or other similar expressions. Statements that look forward in time or include anything other than historical information are subject to risks and uncertainties, and actual results, actions or events could differ materially from those set forth in the FLS. FLS are not guarantees of future performance and are by their nature based on numerous assumptions. Although the FLS contained herein are based upon what Middlefield Funds and the portfolio manager believe to be reasonable assumptions, neither Middlefield Funds nor the portfolio manager can assure that actual results will be consistent with these FLS. The reader is cautioned to consider the FLS carefully and not to place undue reliance on FLS. Unless required by applicable law, it is not undertaken, and specifically disclaimed that there is any intention or obligation to update or revise FLS, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
This material has been prepared for informational purposes only without regard to any particular user’s investment objectives or financial situation. This communication constitutes neither a recommendation to enter into a particular transaction nor a representation that any product described herein is suitable or appropriate for you. Investment decisions should be made with guidance from a qualified professional. The opinions contained in this report are solely those of Middlefield Limited (“ML”) and are subject to change without notice. ML makes every effort to ensure that the information has been derived from sources believed to reliable, but we cannot represent that they are complete or accurate. However, ML assumes no responsibility for any losses or damages, whether direct or indirect which arise from the use of this information. ML is under no obligation to update the information contained herein. This document is not to be construed as a solicitation, recommendation or offer to buy or sell any security, financial product or instrument.
